Ultimate Guide for Learning A DevOps Organization Structure

Take advantage of this expectation of DevOps and make sure to embrace new ideas at least for a short testing period to see what works best for you. It’s a mentality of communication and cooperation that should be integrated into your entire organization. DevOps also requires support and reinforcement by management to perform at its best.

devops organizational structure

If you’re just getting started with DevOps, there are several team organizational models to consider. As DevOps is started up as a pilot program, a DevOps team forms to learn the new tools and technologies and then begin implementation. Then they become their own silo, making sure the uneducated masses don’t spoil their new utopia. This one may seem pretty obvious as an anti-pattern, but many organizations devops organizational structure that try to adopt DevOps try to do so without breaking down the barriers between the groups. It is hard to do that when team members are reporting to different departments, being measured on different criteria, and working towards different goals. We have a reliability group that manages uptime and reliability for GitLab.com, a quality department, and a distribution team, just to name a few.

2.3. Encouraging Regular Communication and Collaboration

Your organization’s primary silo boundary might not be between development and operations. Many organizations used variations of DevOps as an internal campaign to increase collaboration. This is where DevSecOps and BizOps encouraged specialists to work closer together. While Ian Buchanan has broad and deep experience with both Java and .NET, he is best known as a champion of lean and agile practices in large enterprises. Mature teams release multiple times per week, and in some cases, multiple times per day.

devops organizational structure

This approach also accommodates having several separate Dev-teams that can work in parallel on partially independent products. Platform teams work with development teams to create one or more golden pathways. These pathways don’t prevent teams from using something else but offer supported self-service products that help teams improve delivery https://www.globalcloudteam.com/ capability. It’s likely to succeed if the team has members from both existing teams and where it’s a stepping stone to cross-functional teams. The Spotify Model fosters collaboration, autonomy, and a shared sense of purpose by enabling squads to work independently while still maintaining alignment with the organization’s broader goals.

DevOps practices

Continuing to scale DevOps across the organization involves promoting a DevOps mindset, establishing a DevOps leadership team, creating a DevOps community, and measuring success to demonstrate value. By adopting these strategies and maintaining a relentless focus on improvement, organizations can fully realize the benefits of DevOps, leading to enhanced collaboration, rapid delivery, and superior software quality. A DevOps culture thrives on collaboration, communication, and shared responsibilities. In order to achieve a successful DevOps transformation, it is essential to clearly define the roles and responsibilities within the team. This section will explore the key roles and their respective responsibilities in a DevOps team.

devops organizational structure

There are a lot of different ways to position DevOps within the organization, and what works in one environment doesn’t always fit the needs or culture of another. Obviously the software development lifecycle today is full of moving parts, meaning that defining the right structure for a DevOps team will remain fluid and in need of regular re-evaluation. In this team structure, there are still separate dev and ops teams, but there is now a “DevOps” team that sits between, as a facilitator of sorts. This is not necessarily a bad thing and Skelton stresses that this arrangement has some use cases.

3.5 Scrum Masters or Agile Coaches

Hold regular retrospective meetings within each team that gives members an opportunity to express their opinion on how things have gone and how they would like to do things moving into the future. Take advantage of the fluid nature of DevOps and Agile by encouraging experimentation and embracing a fast rate of change. Avoid becoming married to set systems and protocol because not every solution will work for your teams or your organization. Where part of your system is highly specialized, you might use a complicated subsystem team to manage it.

  • These silos can lead to a lack of communication, collaboration, and shared goals, ultimately resulting in slower software delivery and lower quality.
  • You need the right people, platform, and processes set up before you implement DevOps.
  • Adopting DevOps and hiring DevOps experts or an agency following DevOps structure саn turn оut tо be vаluаble fоr а business to imрlement it wisely.
  • In order to scale DevOps effectively, it is vital to establish a DevOps leadership team that drives and supports the adoption of DevOps practices throughout the organization.
  • In this model, development teams provide logs and other artifacts to the SRE team to prove their software meets a sufficient standard for support from the SRE team.

If you’re just starting your journey to DevOps, learn best practices with our Beginner’s guide to DevOps. To put DevOps into practice, we recommend trying Open DevOps, which provides everything teams need to develop and operate software. Teams can build the DevOps toolchain they want, thanks to integrations with leading vendors and marketplace apps.

Create the ideal DevOps team structure

Organizations like this still see ops as something that supports the initiatives for software development, not something with value in itself. Organizations like this suffer from basic operational mistakes and could be much more successful if they understand the value ops brings to the table. This means when you are deploying your app, rather than installing various dependencies or services manually. Without requiring constant input from operators or developers to establish DevOps organization structure.

We also have other functional DevOps groups besides “Dev” that manage other aspects of our product. One way of doing so; start with creating an environment where developers are encouraged to implement changes in production. This will require the use of automation and measurement to ensure that all team members are on board with DevOps practices before implementing them more broadly across your organization.

2.2. Creating Cross-Functional Teams

By encouraging open communication and collaboration, fostering a blameless culture, focusing on customer needs, and prioritizing experimentation and innovation, organizations can create an environment where DevOps thrives. This will lead to increased efficiency, innovation, and a more collaborative working environment, ultimately transforming software delivery and collaboration within the organization. This team structure, popularized by Google, is where a development team hands off a product to the Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) team, who actually runs the software. In this model, development teams provide logs and other artifacts to the SRE team to prove their software meets a sufficient standard for support from the SRE team. Development and SRE teams collaborate on operational criteria and SRE teams are empowered to ask developers to improve their code before production.

While there are multiple ways to do DevOps, there are also plenty of ways to not do it. Teams and DevOps leaders should be wary of anti-patterns, which are marked by silos, lack of communication, and a misprioritization of tools over communication. In our DevOps Trends survey, we found that more than two-thirds of surveyed organizations have a team or individual that carries the title “DevOps” in some capacity. If the goal of the DevOps team is to make itself obsolete by bringing the other teams together then they can be effective as evangelists and coaches.

Different teams require different structures, depending on the broader context of the company.

These include greater opportunities for knowledge sharing and narrow specialization within a particular team or department. If you find that mono-functional teams work well with the rest of the organization, you should not reformat them for the sake of the idea of reorganization. What is important is not the structure of the organization itself, but the interaction between the teams to improve the overall effectiveness of the organization as a whole.

Leave a comment